This is the first instalment of a series
of articles based on our observations at design crits and workshops in local
universities, written with the primary objective of promoting discourse amongst
fellow architects (as employers) and the possible benefit to our student
readers. The topics of our articles are loosely based on the sub-headings in
the marking sheets.
SITE ANALYSIS
All students are required to conduct a
site analysis when they receive their project brief. Sometimes this part of the
assignment is carried out as group work, especially if the site is large or out
of town. What we then see is that the task of preparing the analysis is divided
into sections such as sun orientation, traffic, neighbouring built environment
and so forth. Often these tasks are carried out by small groups and later re-compiled
as part of the submission.
Therein lies the problem – that the
students are doing the ‘site analysis’ are part of the submission because the
school requires them to do so, so that marks can be given. Often this is just
recording, without the analysis. The findings are not used as site forces to
drive the brief nor mould the final outcome; the design scheme.
Note
to students
It
is important to take on the non-tangible aspects of a site as well as physical,
this might be patterns of movement at different times of the day, its social
history and the aspirations of the local population – this is especially true
for life projects.
When I. M. Pei was offered the commission
to reconstruct the Louvre Museum in Paris in 1983, he made several secretive
trips to Paris (without telling anyone in his firm). The purpose of these
visits was for him to determine the feasibility of the reconstruction project,
which called for the re-design of the museum (its entrance, especially) and the
addition of exhibition space.
|
Initial design sketch of the Pyramid entrance. The dot to the left of the sketch is a folly; a smaller inverted pyramid with its apex in the underground lobby |
He spent these trips walking the neighbourhoods
near the site where he observed the movement of people especially in the main
courtyard (Cour Napoleon). This may have resulted in the opening up of the
gateway in the north so that people can walk through the court on their way to
the Rue de Rivoli (and the Metro). Pei did this to allow the city to meld with
the realm of the museum; creating a crossroads of culture and public life.
|
Pei's solution was to place the new entrance in the gravel-filled Cour Napoléon, an exterior courtyard enclosed by the museum’s existing buildings |
Pei also understood that the enclosing wings
of the Louvre were built gradually over time and that the new Louvre Pyramid
would be a continuation of the Museum’s rich history. This may have resulted in
his decision to sink that entire visitors’ lobby under forecourt; an act of
subservience perhaps. And though the pyramid is an imposing form, its sloping
sides built in glass obscured very little of the existing buildings around the
main court. In fact, the pyramid’s sloping sides offer a perfect frame to view
the French Renaissance facades from lobby below.
|
Pei's solution was to place the new entrance in the gravel-filled Cour Napoléon, an exterior courtyard enclosed by the museum’s existing buildings
|
These are just a two of the site forces
in play – one which is physical with the full weight of history while the other
is transient like the echo of footsteps on a stone floor. Both were used to
reinforce the narrative of the final design – together with many others too
varied to list here.
Note
to students: Watch
I.M. Pei in ‘First Person Singular’.
http://architectuul.com/architecture/view_image/louvre-pyramid/9355
https://science.howstuffworks.com/engineering/architecture/louvre-pyramid.htm
Closer to home, DNA’s Masijd Wan Alwi is
a good local example of how several site forces shaped and placed the buildings
and spaces within the mosque complex.
·
The Kiblat determined the
orientation of the prayer hall
·
A grove of existing trees meant
siting the buildings away from the street, giving the prayer hall a planted
forecourt.
·
The alignment of the street
provided the angle for the enclosing garden wall
·
An existing surau (converted
into a new Tadika) was the starting point of the wall, and decided the areas
for male and female ablutions.
·
The river in front of the
prayer hall reminded us to raise the building on stilts so that breezes will
ventilate the internal spaces.
Note
to students: When
all the site forces line up in support of the scheme, it becomes very hard to
dislodge the arrangement and positioning of the buildings and spaces. This is
very important during design crit when tutors question the rationale behind
your design, likewise for architects when clients need reassurance on the
‘ideal’ site layout plan.
|
Masjid Wan Alwi as seen from the road. |
Schools can guide students in this area
of design by looking at prominent buildings, complexes and cities and try to
de-construct the thinking behind its placement, orientation and its form. This
is a good event that can take place at
the beginning of the semester, as an eye-opener for the uninitiated and a
refresher for the uninspired.
Students must visit the site at
different times of the day, and spend some time there to take notes instead of
photographs. Sketching cross sections of streets is a good way of recording the
terrain, changes in levels and sight lines.
If it is a site in an unfamiliar city or town, talk to the locals and
ask them questions – what do people there do on the weekends? what is a
favourite pastime?
Liu Jian Kun, the architect for
Chengdu’s West Village said this of the locals – if there is one thing that the
locals enjoy more than drinking tea and chatting with friends, it is drinking
tea and chatting with friends in the shade of tall bamboo. The resulting project
left much of the street untouched and extended their reach overhead in a series
of looped paths, ramps and steps prolonging the journey and increasing the
opportunities of meeting friends.
To conclude, the site analysis must be
carried out as a research project, to seek catalysts that would trigger the
onset of the design process, and be constantly reminded that some of the
strongest site forces are unseen. Like a person, one needs to spend time with
the site to know it, and preferably on your own, not in a group.